Keith A. Arrick, Sr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for relief from the courts judgment dismissing his Bivens * claim. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district courts docket reveals that the district court, on March 31, 2021, denied Arricks Rule 59 motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Arricks case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot and deny Arricks motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE
. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).
PER CURIAM:
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.