PER CURIAM.
It is ordered that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause is hereby denied.
One point deserves clarification. Petitioner argues that the search in question must be found to be “unreasonable” under the Fourth Amendment. He contends that the present case is controlled by Chapman v. United States, 1961, 365 U.S. 610, 81 S.Ct. 776, 5 L.Ed.2d 828. Since we held that the location of the evidence in question was not within the protection of the Fourth Amendment, the reasonableness of the search is not a relevant constitutional consideration.