LAW.coLAW.co

RICHARDSON v. FIRST CENTENNIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION 100 (2021)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.2021-08-02No. No. 19-55281

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Gregory Richardson appeals pro se from an order denying reconsideration of an order dismissing his claims against two defendants, Dane McClain and First Centennial Mortgage Corporation (First Centennial), without leave to amend. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Symantec Corp. v. Glob. Impact, Inc., 559 F.3d 922, 923 (9th Cir. 2009).

The district courts dismissal orders were not final because they did not dispose of all of Richardsons claims. See Prellwitz v. Sisto, 657 F.3d 1035, 1038 (9th Cir. 2011); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). Accordingly, the district courts denial of Richardsons motion for reconsideration was also not final. See Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990).

“All pending motions are denied as moot.” In re Suspension of Pipkins, 154 F.3d 1009, 1010 (9th Cir. 1998).

DISMISSED.