MEMORANDUM **
Manuel Salvador Torres-Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judges decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except to the extent that deference is owed to the BIAs interpretation of the governing statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We review for substantial evidence the agencys factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agencys conclusion that Torres-Perez failed to establish he would be persecuted on account of a cognizable particular social group or any other protected ground.
1
See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (concluding that an applicants “desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”). Thus, Torres-Perezs withholding of removal claim fails.
Substantial evidence also supports the agencys denial of CAT protection because Torres-Perez failed to show it is more likely than not that he will be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. See Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).
The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
FOOTNOTES
1
. Torres-Perez does not challenge the agencys determination that he did not demonstrate changed or extraordinary circumstances sufficient to excuse his untimely asylum application.