The Court denies the petition for writ of prohibition on the merits. See Topps v. State, 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that “clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits” is deemed a decision “which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel”); Baldwin v. Crosby, 905 So. 2d 250, 251 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (explaining that in order to remove a lien placed on an inmate trust account, the “proper remedy is to file a motion in the circuit court seeking this relief, secure a ruling, and if necessary raise the issue when appellate review is sought of any final order in the proceedings below”).
Per Curiam.
B.L. Thomas, Jay, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.