On appeal from an order advised by Vice-Chancellor Van Fleet granting an injunction restraining the appellant from further constructing its railroad on the land in question in the suit, until it should have made just compensation to the respondent for his estate in the same, whose opinion is reported in Pratt v. Roseland Railway Co., and John J. Van Order, 5 Dick. Ch. Rev. 150.
Roseland Railway Company, appellant, v. Julius H. Pratt, respondent
58 N.J. Eq. 585
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.