Michael LoCascio appeals the denial of a successive motion for postconviction relief. Including direct appeal, this is the third time he has raised some of these issues, and at least the second time he has raised the rest. Mr. LoCascio claims newly discovered evidence warrants an evidentiary hearing. However, Mr. LoCascio has previously presented these issues, along with the purported relevant evidence, before both the trial court and this Court. Each time, this Court found no merit to the claims. See LoCascio v. State, No. 3D12-574, 2012 WL 1109484 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr. 4, 2012); see also LoCascio v. State, 76 So. 3d 304 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM.