We affirm the School Boards order terminating appellants employment. The Boards rejection of conclusions reached in the administrative law judges order, which were mixed questions of fact and law, were imbued with policy considerations on which the appellate court should defer to the agency. See Winters v. Fla. Bd. of Regents, 834 So. 2d 243, 250 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (affirming in part agency order which rejected hearing officers findings and conclusions, noting that “where the matter under review ‘is infused with overriding policy considerations, the issue should be left to the agency.’ ” (citing Pillsbury v. State, Dept of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 744 So. 2d 1040, 1042 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999))).
Affirmed.
Per Curiam.
Warner, Levine and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.