LAW.coLAW.co

MILLER v. STATE (2021)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.2021-11-02No. Case No. 5D21-827

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

AFFIRMED. See State v. Partlow, 840 So. 2d 1040, 1042 (Fla. 2003) (holding that “once sentence has been imposed, to withdraw a plea a defendant must demonstrate a manifest injustice requiring correction” (citing Lopez v. State, 536 So. 2d 226, 229 (Fla. 1988))); Bonamy v. State, 313 So. 3d 1214, 1215 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021) (affirming denial of the defendants motion to withdraw plea where “[t]he coercion alleged after sentencing is refuted by the transcript and the written plea agreement” (quoting Rivera v. State, 984 So. 2d 574, 574 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (additional citations omitted))); Thompson v. State, 50 So. 3d 1208, 1211 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“A defendant is bound by his sworn answers during a plea colloquy.” (citing Iacono v. State, 930 So. 2d 829, 831 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006))).

PER CURIAM.

LAMBERT, C.J., TRAVER and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.