The Census Act requires the Secretary of Commerce to deliver population data to the states by April 1, 2021. 13 U.S.C. § 141. Under Ohios Constitution, Ohio uses that data to redraw its state and federal voting districts. The Secretary failed to meet the statutory deadline, so Ohio sued. It asked the district court to order the data released at “the earliest possible date.” R. 1, Pg. ID 16. The district court held that Ohio lacked standing and dismissed the case. We conclude that Ohio has standing and reverse and remand.
Ohio meets all three requirements for standing: (1) injury in fact, (2) traceability, and (3) redressability. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560–61, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). First, Ohio suffered (and continues to suffer) an informational injury because the Secretary failed to deliver Ohios data as the Census Act requires. Fed. Election Commn v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11, 21, 118 S.Ct. 1777, 141 L.Ed.2d 10 (1998); Pub. Citizen v. U.S. Dept of Justice, 491 U.S. 440, 448–50, 109 S.Ct. 2558, 105 L.Ed.2d 377 (1989). Second, the injury is traceable to the Secretary because Ohios informational injury is the direct result of the Secretarys failure to produce the required data. Am. Canoe Assn, Inc. v. City of Louisa Water & Sewer Commn, 389 F.3d 536, 543 (6th Cir. 2004). And third, Ohios injury is redressable. The Census Bureau represents that it can deliver Ohios data in a “legacy format” by August 16, 2021—well before the September 30, 2021, projection that the agency previously identified. Whitehorne Decl., Appellate R. 33, p. 2. Although Ohio would prefer to get its data sooner, Ohio agrees that an August 16 delivery would allow it to complete its redistricting process. But Ohio currently has no assurance that the federal government will live up to its most recent representation. So at the very least, monitoring by the district court could move the proceedings along and provide Ohio with some redress.
For these reasons, we conclude that Ohio has standing and remand the case to the district court. With only three months until the proffered resolution date, the district court should treat this matter expediently and hold a hearing to determine what remedy (if any) is appropriate.
PER CURIAM.