The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent David Pruner has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pruner has filed a response in which he asks to dismiss the appeal of his sentence. We have reviewed counsels brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Pruners response. We concur with counsels assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsels motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED and counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein. The motion to dismiss the appeal as to the sentence is likewise GRANTED. The appeal is DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part on Pruners motion, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(a).
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE
Per Curiam:*
FN* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.