John Kimble appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He argues that the trial court imposed a vindictive sentence when he was resentenced pursuant to a successful motion to correct sentencing error. Because the postconviction court properly determined that a vindictive sentencing claim is not cognizable under rule 3.800(a), we affirm. See Jackson v. State, 193 So. 3d 1, 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Bouno v. State, 900 So. 2d 672, 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Taylor v. State, 897 So. 2d 495, 496 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Boyd v. State, 880 So. 2d 726, 727 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
Affirmed.
Per Curiam.
Ray, Makar, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.