Writ application granted. See per curiam.
Our jurisprudence has long recognized that “the right of a litigant to jury trial is fundamental in character and the courts will indulge every presumption against a waiver, loss or forfeiture thereof.” Champagne v. American Southern Ins. Co., 295 So. 2d 437, 439 (La. 1974).
In this case, relators filed their jury deposit within ten days of the date another party failed to make a timely deposit. Relators jury deposit is therefore timely. See La. Code Civ. P. art. 1734.1; Willeby v. JE Merit Constructors, Inc., 04-2421 (La. App. 1 Cir. 6/10/05), 917 So. 2d 21. We find Plauche v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 2011-1288 (La. App. 3 Cir. 5/16/12), 89 So. 3d 521, writ denied, 2012-1365 (La. 10/8/12), 98 So. 3d 854, distinguishable from the matter sub judice.
Accordingly, the writ is granted. The judgment of the district court is reversed, and the jury trial is reinstated. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.