LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES v. NUNEZ UGARTE (2021)

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.2021-07-13No. No. 21-50080

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

Genaro Alberto Nunez-Ugarte appeals the 37-month prison sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation. He argues that his sentence was imposed under an unconstitutional statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). He correctly concedes that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), but raises the issue to preserve for further possible review. See United States v. Wallace, 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625-26 (5th Cir. 2007).

The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance and, alternatively, seeks an extension of time to file its brief. Because the issue is foreclosed, summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).

Accordingly, the Governments motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Governments alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE

Per Curiam:  *

FN* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.