The attorney appointed to represent Kevin Raheem Penn has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Penn has filed responses. We have reviewed counsels briefs and the relevant parts of the record reflected therein, as well as Penns responses. We concur with counsels assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, Penns motions to appoint new counsel and to hold the case in abeyance are both DENIED; counsels motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED; counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein; and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE
Per Curiam:*
FN* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.