A jury convicted Alberto Luciano Torres-Martinez of illegally entering the United States after deportation. On April 15, 2020, Torres-Martinez was sentenced to 14 months in prison but was immediately released due to credit for time served. The district court also imposed a one-year term of supervised release to take effect immediately upon the expiration of the prison term. More than one year has passed since the imposition of the judgment and the completion of Torres-Martinezs term of imprisonment, so his term of supervised release has also expired. Torres-Martinez timely appealed, challenging his term of supervised release.
“This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). “Whether an appeal is moot is a jurisdictional matter, since it implicates the Article III requirement that there be a live case or controversy.” Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir. 1987). A case becomes moot when it is “impossible for a court to grant any effectual relief whatever.” Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, 577 U.S. 153, 161, 136 S.Ct. 663, 193 L.Ed.2d 571 (2016). Because the record reflects that Torres-Martinezs terms of imprisonment and supervised release are complete, the court cannot grant him any relief, and there is no case or controversy to address. See United States v. Stanley, 145 F. Appx 499 (5th Cir. 2005).
APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT.
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE
Per Curiam:**
FN** Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.