[Unpublished]
Randy Davidson, Bonnie Davidson, Travis Doran, and Mark Reyes appeal following the district courts
1
adverse grant of summary judgment and denial of their Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion in their civil rights action.
Initially, we conclude that the December 14 notice of appeal (NOA) was timely filed within 30 days of the November 12 order denying plaintiffs’ Rule 60(b) motion for reconsideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 26(a)(1)(C). However, because the May 19 Rule 60(b) motion was not filed within 28 days after the April 20 judgment was entered, it was not timely to toll the time to appeal the judgment or the earlier partial dismissal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(A)(vi). Thus, we have jurisdiction to review only the November 12 denial of the Rule 60(b) motion. See Dieser v. Contl Cas. Co., 440 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir. 2006).
We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the Rule 60(b) motion, as the denial was not based on clearly erroneous fact findings or erroneous conclusions of law, and plaintiffs did not present exceptional circumstances warranting relief under that rule. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b); Giles v. Saint Lukes Northland-Smithville, 908 F.3d 365, 368 (8th Cir. 2018); Noah v. Bond Cold Storage, 408 F.3d 1043, 1045 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
FOOTNOTES
1
. The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
PER CURIAM.