[Unpublished]
JoAngela King appeals the district courts
2
order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits. After careful consideration of Kings arguments for reversal, we affirm. We agree with the district court that the administrative law judge (ALJ) did not abuse his discretion in electing not to subpoena Kings tax records, see Passmore v. Astrue, 533 F.3d 658, 665-66 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review); Yancey v. Apfel, 145 F.3d 106, 113 (2d Cir. 1998) (no abuse of discretion in denying claimants request for subpoena, as ALJ allowed claimant fair and meaningful opportunity to present her case, and had no indication that subpoenaing witness would add anything of value to proceedings); and did not otherwise fail to adequately develop the record, see Lacroix v. Barnhart, 465 F.3d 881, 886 (8th Cir. 2006) (claimant failed to establish prejudice necessary for reversal due to failure to develop record, as she presented no evidence suggesting that inquiry would have yielded information sought). We also find no due process violation, as King had the opportunity to present arguments at multiple hearings, see Schwandt v. Berryhill, 926 F.3d 1004, 1010 (8th Cir. 2019) (due process requires that parties be afforded opportunity to present their objections); and find no merit to Kings contention that the ALJ was biased against her, see Perkins v. Astrue, 648 F.3d 892, 903 (8th Cir. 2011) (claimant must show that ALJs behavior displayed clear inability to render fair judgment).
The judgment is affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
2
. The Honorable Brian C. Buescher, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
PER CURIAM.