[Unpublished]
Arkansas prisoner Christopher Everett appeals the district courts
1
grant of summary judgment dismissing his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.
Having carefully reviewed the record, see Gibson v. Weber, 431 F.3d 339, 341 (8th Cir. 2005) (standard of review), we conclude that no genuine dispute of material fact exists as to whether Everett exhausted the administrative remedies available to him prior to filing suit, see 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (stating that no action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under § 1983 by a prisoner until available administrative remedies are exhausted); Johnson v. Jones, 340 F.3d 624, 627 (8th Cir. 2003) (stating that an inmate must exhaust all available administrative remedies before filing suit in federal court). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. FOOTNOTES
1
. The Honorable James M. Moody Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
PER CURIAM.