Adam Nicklous Carr appeals the district courts order denying his renewed motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). Upon review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 328–29 (4th Cir. Apr. 1, 2021) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *
United States v. Carr, No. 1:01-cr-00126-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 15, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE
. We have reviewed this case with consideration of Carrs transfer to USP Yazoo City.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.