LAW.coLAW.co

STATE v. FRAZIER (2021)

Court of Appeals of Oregon.2021-11-17No. A173673

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

Defendant pleaded guilty to possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894(2), and failure to appear on a criminal citation, ORS 133.076, reserving her right to challenge on appeal the trial courts denial of her motion to dismiss.

1

She also challenges the imposition of a $100 bench probation fee that was not announced in open court at sentencing. We reject without discussion defendants argument concerning the motion to dismiss. See State v. Robison, 233 Or. App. 90, 227 P.3d 169 (2009) (rejecting similar argument). Defendant next argues that the trial court erred in imposing a $100 bench probation fee with respect to her failure-to-appear conviction because the court did not announce that fee on the record in defendants presence at sentencing. The state concedes that the court erred in that respect. We agree and accept that concession. See State v. Anotta, 312 Or. App. 220, 493 P.3d 26 (2021) (correcting similar error). Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

FOOTNOTES

1

.   ORS 475.894 has been amended since defendant committed her crime; however, because those amendments do not affect our analysis, we refer to the current version of the statute in this opinion.

PER CURIAM