MEMORANDUM **
The Commissioner of Internal Revenue appeals the Tax Courts summary judgment in favor of Beverly Clark Collection, LLC (“Petitioner”) on statute-of-limitations grounds. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1), and we review the Tax Courts grant of summary judgment de novo. Sollberger v. Commr, 691 F.3d 1119, 1123 (9th Cir. 2012). We affirm.
The Tax Court properly granted summary judgment because the Commissioners Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment of Petitioners Form 1065 for tax year 2000 was issued outside of the applicable three-year limitations period in 26 U.S.C. § 6501(a). A six-year limitations period does not apply because Nelson and Beverly Clarks’ partial reporting of gain from the transaction at issue was not an “omi[ssion]” under 26 U.S.C. § 6501(e)(1)(A) (2000). See Colony, Inc. v. Commr, 357 U.S. 28, 32, 78 S.Ct. 1033, 2 L.Ed.2d 1119 (1958) (defining “omit” in predecessor statute as “[t]o leave out or unmentioned; not to insert, include, or name”); United States v. Home Concrete & Supply, LLC, 566 U.S. 478, 482, 132 S.Ct. 1836, 182 L.Ed.2d 746 (2012) (elaborating that “ ‘omit’ limits [§ 6501(e)(1)(A)]’s scope to situations in which specific receipts or accruals of income are left out of the computation of gross income”). We find unpersuasive the Commissioners attempt to distinguish Colony, Inc. and Home Concrete & Supply, LLC and also his invitation to rely on out-of-circuit authority predating Home Concrete & Supply, LLC.
AFFIRMED.