Defendant challenges his convictions for multiple sexual offenses, raising three assignments of error. We affirm.
On defendants first assignment of error, we are not persuaded that the trial court plainly erred by failing to sua sponte enter a judgment of acquittal on a count of first-degree sexual abuse. Defendants second and third assignments of error challenge the trial courts nonunanimous instruction to the jury. However, because the verdict was unanimous, defendants arguments are foreclosed by State v. Flores Ramos, 367 Or. 292, 478 P.3d 515 (2020), and State v. Kincheloe, 367 Or. 335, 478 P.3d 507 (2020), cert. den., ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S.Ct. 2837, ––– L. Ed. 2d ––––, No. 20-8126 (June 21, 2021).
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM