Carl L. Linyard seeks to appeal the district courts orders granting in part and denying in part his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5122, and denying Linyards motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. *
Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Linyard, No. 9:03-cr-00620-DCN-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 6, 2020; Apr. 30, 2020). We deny Linyards motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE
. Because Linyard does not challenge on appeal the district courts failure to consider his postconviction rehabilitation efforts, this opinion does not address that issue.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.