Curtis Richardson appeals the district courts judgment finding in favor of Defendant in accordance with the jurys verdict and dismissing Richardsons civil action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Richardsons informal brief does not present any specific claims challenging the judgment, he has forfeited appellate review. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district courts judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.