Michael Ellis Wiggins appeals the district courts order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to § 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying Wiggins’ motion. See United States v. Collington, 995 F.3d 347, 357 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district courts order. United States v. Wiggins, No. 5:10-cr-00055-D-2 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 2020). We also deny Wiggins’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.