Affirmed. See Kitchen Design Cabinets, Inc. v. Bentley, 320 So. 3d 1013, 1013-14 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) (“[T]he determination of whether particular conduct constitutes excusable neglect ․ is a factual one, to be decided by the trial judge.” (alterations in original) (citation omitted)); DND Mail Corp. v. Andgen Props., LLC, 28 So. 3d 111, 113 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“An order granting a motion to vacate a default final judgment is reviewed under a ‘gross abuse of discretion’ standard.” (citation omitted)); Shurgard Storage Ctrs., Inc. v. Parker, 755 So. 2d 695, 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (“[W]here inaction results from clerical or secretarial error, reasonable misunderstanding, a system gone awry or any other of the foibles to which human nature is heir, then upon timely application accompanied by a reasonable and credible explanation the matter should be permitted to be heard on the merits.” (citation omitted)).
PER CURIAM.
CIKLIN, LEVINE and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.