This is an Anders
*
appeal. We have identified no arguable issues on the face of the record. Appellants probation was violated based on witness testimony which contradicted Appellants testimony. The trial court found the witness testimony more credible than Appellants testimony. We do not reweigh or second-guess the trial courts findings as to the credibility of witnesses. Brown v. State, 959 So. 2d 146, 149 (Fla. 2007). Appellants convictions and sentences are legal on their face. Affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
FOOTNOTE
. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Per Curiam.
Ray, Nordby, and Long, JJ., concur.