Affirmed. See Leos Gulf Liquors v. Lakhani, 802 So. 2d 337, 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (“We conclude that the trial judges thoughtful and complete analysis of the facts presented in support of defendants’ motion to dismiss for fraud upon the court is amply supported by the record and does not constitute an abuse of discretion.”); Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Martinsen, 736 So. 2d 794, 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (“[A] party who has been guilty of fraud or misconduct in the prosecution or defense of a civil proceeding should not be permitted to continue to employ the very institution it has subverted to achieve her ends.” (quoting Hanono v. Murphy, 723 So. 2d 892, 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998))).
PER CURIAM.