The final judgment of dissolution is affirmed. We find no merit in the issues properly raised by Carolyn Marie Holt n/k/a Carolyn Marie Crowley (the Wife). To the extent that the Wife challenges the trial courts reservation of jurisdiction in the final judgment to entertain attorneys fees motions, the appeal is dismissed. See Baker & Hostetler, LLP v. Swearingen, 998 So. 2d 1158, 1163 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (“The effect of the reservation of jurisdiction over both entitlement and amount [of attorneys fees] is that the matter of fees ha[s] not been finalized.”).
Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.
PER CURIAM.
SILBERMAN, KELLY, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.