Affirmed. See Ness v. Martinez, 249 So. 3d 754, 757-59 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (affirming the trial courts order denying the mothers petition for relocation and granting the fathers petition to modify timesharing); see also Hoyt v. Chalker, 228 So. 3d 697, 699 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (affirming the denial of the mothers petition for relocation, noting that although reasonable judges might have ruled differently at trial in evaluating the best interests of the child, the reviewing courts task is only to determine whether the trial court acted outside of the broad discretion the law gives it).
Per Curiam.
Makar, Jay, and Nordby, JJ., concur.