ORDER
Tanner Propst appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for first-degree assault, first-degree robbery, first-degree burglary, and armed criminal action. In four points on appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because the evidence was insufficient to show beyond a reasonable doubt that he was an accomplice to the crimes. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum explaining the reasons for this decision is provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Per Curiam: