ORDER DENYING PETITION
This petition for a writ of mandamus seeks an order directing the district court to set reasonable bail. We conclude that extraordinary relief is not warranted because petitioner has not met his substantial burden of demonstrating a clear legal right to the relief requested. NRS 34.160; Walker v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 136 Nev. 678, 680-81, 476 P.3d 1194, 1196-97 (2020) (recognizing the petitioners substantial burden to demonstrate a clear legal right to a particular course of action where the court is entrusted with discretion on the issue); Poulos v. Eighth Judicial Dist Court, 98 Nev. 453, 455, 652 P.2d 1177, 1178 (1982) (recognizing that it is within this courts discretion whether to issue a writ of mandamus); Round Hill Gen. Improvement Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 603-04, 637 P.2d 534, 536 (1981) (recognizing that a writ of mandamus is available to compel the performance of an action which the law requires as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station or to control an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion). Here, the district court conducted a hearing on petitioners motion to set reasonable bail and entered written findings addressing the relevant statutory factors. Valdez-Jimenez v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 136 Nev. 155, 164-66, 460 P.3d 976, 986-87 (2020). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
1
FOOTNOTES
1
. The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.