ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court order imposing random drug testing.
This court has original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus, and the issuance of such extraordinary relief is within this courts sole discretion. See Nev. Const. art. 6, § 4; D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 123 Nev. 468, 474-75, 168 P.3d 731, 736-37 (2007). Petitioner bears the burden to show that extraordinary relief is warranted, and such relief is proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004).
Although petitioner references a ruling by the district court, he has not provided this court with either a copy of an order imposing random drug testing or any of the documents necessary for this courts consideration of the petition. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing that petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents “essential to understand[ing] the matters set forth in the petition”). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.