Affirmed. See Orta v. Polas, 579 So. 2d 918, 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (“The standard of review in a case of retroactive child support is whether the trial court abused its discretion.”); Viscito v. Viscito, 214 So. 3d 736, 737 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“The standard of review of a trial courts determination of equitable distribution is abuse of discretion.” (quoting Bardowell v. Bardowell, 975 So. 2d 628, 629 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008))); Francavilla v. Francavilla, 969 So. 2d 522, 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (“[The] findings of the trial court come to this court clothed with a presumption of correctness and will not be disturbed absent a showing that there was no competent evidence to sustain them.” (quoting Waton v. Waton, 887 So. 2d 419, 422 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004))).
PER CURIAM.