Affirmed. See Arsali v. Chase Home Fin. LLC, 121 So. 3d 511, 519 (Fla. 2013) (“[J]udgments pertaining to set asides of judicial foreclosure sales are now, as they always have been, subject to review by way of an abuse of discretion standard”); Venezia v. Wells Fargo Bank, 306 So. 3d 1096, 1097-98 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (“[T]he law is well-established that an objection to a foreclosure sale must be directed toward conduct that occurred at, or was directly related to, the foreclosure sale”) (citing IndyMac Fed. Bank FSB v. Hagan, 104 So. 3d 1232, 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“Florida case law is clear that the substance of an objection to a foreclosure sale under section 45.031(5) must be directed toward conduct that occurred at, or which related to, the foreclosure sale itself”).
PER CURIAM.