A mother appeals the termination of her parental rights, asserting termination is not in the childs best interests. On our de novo review, see In re A.M., 843 N.W.2d 100, 110 (Iowa 2014), we affirm.
The juvenile court terminated the mothers parental rights to her six-year-old child, A.H., on five separate grounds, including the mothers substance abuse, lack of contact with the child, and inability to resume care. The mother does not contest the grounds for termination have been established.
1
She claims termination is not in the childs best interests because of a continuing bond between the mother and child. She argues termination was only requested after the failure of a custody modification in concurrent district court proceedings.
2
Our best-interests analysis is guided by statute, giving “primary consideration to the childs safety, to the best placement for furthering the long-term nurturing and growth of the child, and to the physical, mental, and emotional condition and needs of the child.” Iowa Code § 232.116(2) (2022). If the grounds for termination are established, “we cannot deprive a child of permanency ․ by hoping someday a parent will learn to be a parent and be able to provide a stable home for the child.” A.M., 843 N.W.2d at 112.
From the time of removal in December 2020, the mother spiraled downward, with a worsening mental-health condition exacerbated by self-medication with opiates and then methamphetamine. Her problems affected her visits with the child, and in May 2021, the childs therapist recommended stopping visits as they were harming the child. The mother has only seen the child briefly a couple times since visits stopped. The mother recently engaged in outpatient substance-abuse and mental-health programs and restarted medication for her mental health. The custodial father testified he would allow contact if the mother were clean and sober, but he was concerned she would not maintain sobriety based on her history.
The mothers unresolved mental-health issues and relapsing substance-abuse strongly affect her ability to parent the child in a healthy and consistent manner. The mother loves the child deeply but is in no position to provide the safe, stable home the child deserves. Termination of the mothers parental rights will best provide for the physical, mental, and emotional condition and needs of the child and further the childs long-term nurturing and growth. We thus affirm.
AFFIRMED.
FOOTNOTES
1
. Because the mother does not contest grounds for termination have been proved by clear and convincing evidence, we do not discuss this step of our analysis. See In re P.L., 778 N.W.2d 33, 40 (Iowa 2010).
2
. A proposed joint stipulation for modification was filed in the concurrent proceedings, but during a hearing on the matter, the mother made statements withdrawing her consent, and the custody modification was denied.
BOWER, Chief Judge.