AMENDED ORDER
The Court en banc has considered American Oversights Motion for Reconsideration and the Senates Response.
With regard to its request for attorneys’ fees, American Oversight asks the Court to address its request by (1) acknowledging that it prevailed in part and (2) directing the trial court to consider that partial success when deciding any forthcoming fee application.
Here, this Court granted review on three issues: (1) whether the Senates audit records were protected by legislative privilege; (2) whether a prima facie claim of legislative privilege requires an affirmative showing of legislative impairment; and (3) the burden of proof framework and standard that control challenges to privilege log entries. In its Response, the Senate argues that the Court “adopted unqualifiedly the Senates positions with respect to the first two issues” and “substantially ratified the Senates conception of the factual and legal showing necessary to obtain in camera review of purportedly privileged materials.”
Although this opinion resolved certain issues of first impression, on balance, the Court agrees with the Senate that American Oversight did not substantially prevail in this special action. The trial court will no doubt consider this opinion and other holdings in its ultimate determination of which party substantially prevailed. After consideration,
IT IS ORDERED denying the Motion for Reconsideration.
DATED this 29th day of September, 2022.
JOHN R. LOPEZ IV Justice