LAW.coLAW.co

STATE v. RENTERIO (2022)

Court of Appeals of Kansas.2022-07-22No. No. 124,673

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Miguel S. Renterio appeals the district courts sentencing decision because it did not follow the recommendations in his plea agreement. We granted Renterios motion for summary disposition under Kansas Supreme Court Rule 7.041A (2022 Kan. S. Ct. R. at 48). The State did not respond.

Under the revised Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act, we lack jurisdiction to review Renterios sentence because it was within the presumptive range for the crimes charged. K.S.A. 2021 Supp. 21-6820(c)(1); State v. Albano, 313 Kan. 638, 640, 487 P.3d 750 (2021). Also, the district court was not bound by the sentencing recommendations made in the plea agreement. State v. Beck, 307 Kan. 108, 110, 406 P.3d 377 (2017).

Appeal dismissed under Supreme Court Rule 7.041A(d).

Per Curiam: