ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION
The district court issued a preliminary injunction that prevented Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and other “Enjoined Parties” from foreclosing on, interfering with, or taking other specified actions against Westland Liberty Village, LLC, and Westland Village Square, LLC. Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), in its capacity as conservator for Fannie Mae, sought to intervene.
Prior to the district court permitting FHFAs intervention in the underlying matter, FHFA filed the instant writ petition requesting that this court dissolve the preliminary injunction. FHFA argues that the district court exceeded its jurisdiction under federal law, specifically 12 U.S.C. § 4617(f), and unlawfully restrained FHFAs ability to carry out its duties as conservator of Fannie Mae. FHFA additionally argues that the district court exceeded its jurisdiction under Nevada law by purporting to bind parties that were not before the court and by issuing an impermissibly vague order.
This court recently reversed the underlying preliminary injunction in Federal National Mortgage Association v. Westland Liberty Village, LLC, 138 Nev., Adv. Op. 57, ––– P.3d –––– (2022). Given that the preliminary injunction was reversed, we need not reach the issues raised in this writ petition. See Degraw v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 134 Nev. 330, 332, 419 P.3d 136, 139 (2018) (explaining that this courts duty is to resolve justiciable controversies and that we generally may not give opinions on writ petitions that are moot).
Therefore, we decline to exercise our discretion to consider the extraordinary relief requested and
ORDER the petition DENIED.
2
FOOTNOTES
2
. The Honorable Abbi Silver having retired, this matter was decided by a six-justice court.