ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Our preliminary review of the docketing statement and the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) revealed a potential jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely filed under NRAP 4(b)(1) because it appeared that it was filed more than 30 days after the judgment of conviction was filed. See NRAP 4(b)(1)(A). Accordingly, we directed appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant has filed a response to this courts order to show cause wherein he concedes that the notice of appeal was filed “out of time.” “[A]n untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court.” Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
1
FOOTNOTES
1
. The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in this matter under a general order of assignment.