ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, arguing that this court lacks jurisdiction. Respondent argues that the challenged order is not a final judgment because final judgment was entered at the time the stipulation and confession of judgment between appellant DMVH, LLC, and the receiver was entered and the receivership was terminated, and because the order cannot be otherwise construed as a special order after final judgment because it does not “grow[ ] out of the judgment previously entered.” Gumm v. Mainor, 118 Nev. 912, 914, 59 P.3d 1220, 1221 (2002). Appellants have not filed an opposition. This court may construe the failure to oppose a motion as an admission that the motion is meritorious. See Foster v. Dingwall, 126 Nev. 56, 66, 227 P.3d 1042, 1049 (2010). Therefore, this court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction. The motion to dismiss is granted, and this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.