Motion for leave to appeal insofar as asserted against defendant A. Michael Noll dismissed upon the ground that the orders sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal insofar as asserted against defendant Kenneth Knowlton dismissed upon the ground that timely substitution has not been made (see CPLR 1021).
SCHWARTZ v. NOLL (2022)
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.