¶ 1 For the reasons stated in In re J.R., ––– N.C. ––––, 2022-NCSC-127, ––– S.E.2d ––––, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. AFFIRMED.
PER CURIAM.
Justices HUDSON, MORGAN, and EARLS dissent for the reasons stated in Justice Earls’ dissenting opinion in In re J.R., ––– N.C. ––––, 2022-NCSC-127, ––– S.E.2d ––––.