[¶1] Levi Mayo appealed from a disorderly conduct restraining order entered against him. Mayo broadly contends the district court erred and its decision is unconstitutional and should be reversed. However, Mayos brief on appeal is deficient in identifying and raising a valid issue and does not contain the minimum requirements provided in N.D.R.App.P. 28. Moreover, he has failed to file a transcript of the hearing for our review, and the lack of a transcript on appeal precludes meaningful review. See Smith v. Erickson, 2019 ND 48, ¶ 9, 923 N.W.2d 503 (“If the record on appeal does not allow for an intelligent review of an alleged error, we will decline to review the issue.”). [¶2] Under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8), this Court may summarily affirm a judgment if the appellants brief fails to comply with N.D.R.App.P. 28. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8).
Per Curiam.
[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte