[¶1] Levi Mayo appeals from the district courts order and amended judgment modifying his parenting time.
[¶2] In his brief, Mayo failed to adequately make any legitimate legal arguments or provide any evidentiary record support to allow this Court to conduct its review. Under N.D.R.App.P. 28(b), an appellants brief must contain a statement of the issues presented for review; a statement of facts and, when those facts are disputed, references to the evidentiary record supporting the appellants statement of the facts; and the legal argument, including the authorities on which the appellant relies. Mayos brief does not contain a statement of the issues presented for review, a statement of facts, or any relevant legal authority. Mayo fails to reference any evidentiary record support for his assertions. Mayo also failed to order a transcript, therefore, this Court has nothing to review other than hearing exhibits and the district courts findings and order, which contained no apparent reversible errors. [¶3] Mayos brief does not meet the minimum requirements, therefore, we summarily affirm the district courts order and amended judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8).
Per Curiam.
[¶4] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte