[¶1] T.E. appeals from an order for hospitalization and an order for involuntary treatment with prescribed medication. T.E. argues the district court erred in finding he is mentally ill and a person requiring treatment. He also argues the court erred in granting the request for involuntary treatment with medication. We conclude the courts findings are not clearly erroneous. See In re S.R.B., 2013 ND 109, ¶ 7, 832 N.W.2d 42 (the more probing clearly erroneous standard of review applies to factual findings made by the district court in appeals from an order for hospitalization and treatment). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). Per Curiam.
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte