¶ 1 Defendant appeals from judgment entered upon Alford pleas to possession of cocaine and assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury. Defense counsel filed an Anders brief asking this Court to conduct an independent review of the proceedings to determine whether any non-frivolous justiciable issue exists to support Defendants appeal. After careful review, we find no such issue and dismiss the appeal.
I. Background
¶ 2 On 22 March 2021, Defendant entered an Alford plea
1
to charges of possession of cocaine and assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury. Defendant stipulated to a prior record level of III. The trial court consolidated the offenses for judgment, found four mitigating factors, and sentenced Defendant to 20 to 36 months in prison.
2
On 25 March 2021, Defendant filed a notice of appeal.
II. Appellate Jurisdiction
¶ 3 A written notice of appeal in a criminal case must be filed with the clerk of superior court and must be served “upon all adverse parties within fourteen days after entry of the judgment[.]” N.C. R. App. P. 4(a)(2). Such a written notice of appeal “shall specify the party or parties taking the appeal; shall designate the judgment or order from which appeal is taken and the court to which appeal is taken; and shall be signed by counsel of record for the party or parties taking the appeal, or by any such party not represented by counsel of record.” N.C. R. App. P. 4(b).
¶ 4 Defendant failed to designate this Court as the court to which appeal is taken in his pro se notice of appeal. Defendant also failed to serve his notice of appeal on the State. Recognizing these defects in his notice of appeal, Defendant has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari seeking this Courts review of the 22 March 2021 judgment. This Court may issue a writ of certiorari “in appropriate circumstances ․ to permit review of the judgments and orders of trial tribunals when the right to prosecute an appeal has been lost by failure to take timely action[.]” N.C. R. App. P. 21(a)(1). In our discretion, we grant Defendants petition and review the merits of his appeal.
III. Discussion
¶ 5 Defense counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Kinch, 314 N.C. 99, 331 S.E.2d 665 (1985), explaining that she was “unable to identify an issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief on appeal.” The record discloses that Defense Counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders and Kinch by sending Defendant a letter advising him of his right to file written arguments with this Court, accompanied by copies of the record on appeal, transcript, and Defense Counsels brief. Defendant did not file any written arguments with this Court, and a reasonable time for him to do so has passed.
¶ 6 In accordance with our duty under Anders, we have conducted “a full examination of all the proceedings[,]” including a “review [of] the legal points appearing in the record, transcript, and briefs, not for the purpose of determining their merits (if any) but to determine whether they are wholly frivolous.” Kinch, 314 N.C. at 102-03, 331 S.E.2d at 667. Upon our examination of all the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous, and we dismiss the appeal. See id. at 106, 331 S.E.2d at 669.
DISMISSED.
Report per Rule 30(e).
FOOTNOTES
1
. An Alford plea is a guilty plea in which the defendant does not admit to any criminal act, but admits that there is sufficient evidence to convince the judge or jury of the defendants guilt. See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37 (1970); State v. Baskins, 260 N.C. App. 589, 592 n.1, 818 S.E.2d 381, 387 n.1 (2018).
2
. The same day, the trial court entered an amended judgment to correct a clerical error in the name and class of the assault conviction.
COLLINS, Judge.
Judges DILLON and ZACHARY concur.