{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed as to proposition of law Nos. I and III on the authority of State v. Brasher, ––– Ohio St.3d ––––, 2022-Ohio-4703, ––– N.E.3d ––––, and proposition of law No. II is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. OConnor, C.J., and DeWine, Donnelly, Stewart, and Brunner, JJ., concur.
Kennedy, J., concurs in judgment only in part and dissents in part and would not dismiss the cause as to proposition of law No. II.
Fischer, J., concurs in part and dissents in part and would order briefing on proposition of law Nos. I and III.