ORDER
In light of the recent order of the Supreme Court of the United States, Rivas-Villegas v. Cortesluna, ––– U.S. ––––, 142 S. Ct. 4, 211 L.Ed.2d 164 (2021) (per curiam), we affirm the district courts dismissal of the federal claims against Defendant Daniel Rivas-Villegas. Because the Supreme Courts holding that Rivas-Villegas did not violate clearly established law left undisturbed the majoritys conclusion that, viewing “all the evidence in Plaintiffs favor, Rivas-Villegas used excessive force,” see Cortesluna v. Leon, 979 F.3d 645, 654 (9th Cir. 2020), we remand to the district court for consideration of the other elements of Plaintiffs Monell claim based on Rivas-Villegass conduct and whether that claim can properly be resolved on summary judgment. With respect to Plaintiffs state-law claims relating to Rivas-Villegass conduct, and Plaintiffs other remaining claims, including against other Defendants, our prior majority opinion, Cortesluna v. Leon, 979 F.3d 645 (9th Cir. 2020), remains the same.